Here’s a quick experiment: Take a glass of your favorite drink, and pour half into a second glass, so you’ve got two half-full glasses (or half-empty, if you prefer). Now, fill one up with water, and leave the other alone. Which will taste better? Let’s put it another way: in your office, you have recently gone from having an average of two meetings a week to having daily meetings. In which system did the meetings have more impact? In both of these cases, the preferred option is the undiluted version. Too much water ruins the flavor, and too many meetings will ruin the impact of meetings.
When you schedule meetings, begin by taking steps to ensure it’s a necessary event. For the past several years, the average number of meetings has increased while employee dissatisfaction with meetings has increased. The solution is to decrease the number of meetings, which will help with both issues. Once that has been accounted for, the work of the scheduling begins, and for many the easiest way to do so is with a tool found in a huge number of companies.
Microsoft Outlook scheduling is capable and surprisingly full of features for an email client. Prasanth Chandra explains the basics in an informative how-to guide for Outlook scheduling. There’s an easy way to click on the desired date, invite members and make changes as needed. The option to make a recurring appointment is particularly useful. And yet that’s still a pretty limited interface for meeting scheduling. There are a lot more needs that need to be met. Outlook scheduling is adequate for certain businesses and situations, certainly. On the other hand, Outlook scheduling is absolutely ineffective for organizations with more complex needs.
For instance, when creating a meeting with Microsoft Outlook scheduling, you do so as an attendee. That can result in double bookings, which is entirely unacceptable. Another key feature you won’t find in Outlook scheduling is the ability to schedule resources. If a room has or needs a projector, you won’t be able to ascertain that information with Outlook scheduling. Companies who rely on equipment and vary rooms certainly won’t be able to use Microsoft Outlook scheduling as a stand alone product. Of course because Outlook is so widely used, it’s still a valuable tool to incorporate in a proper scheduling software. Outlook scheduling will only be comprehensive when it is supplemented with a feature-rich software client.
Potency can be achieved through two ways: removing the excess, or by increasing the relevant material. Meeting potency therefore can be achieved through simple math: Decrease the superfluous meetings. Increase the scheduling method’s ability, thus reducing the error and waste.
Photo courtesy Fosforix













